RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-01400
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Fitness Assessment (FA) failures, dated 22 Nov 11 and 25 Jan 
13, be removed from the Air Force Fitness Management System 
(AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her test on 22 Nov 11 was completed on an outside track that was 
later found to be one-fourth of a mile too long.  This track is 
no longer being used.

Her test on 25 Jan 13 was not completed in accordance with AFI 
26-2905, Fitness Program.  Her waist measurement was taken 
during a breath and not after a breath cycle.

The applicant's complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in 
the grade of technical sergeant.  

The applicant’s last seven FA scores are as follows:

	DATE	SCORE

	 1 May 13	SATISFACTORY
	* 25 Jan 13	UNSATISFACTORY
	15 Jun 12	EXEMPT
	 1 Mar 12	SATISFACTORY
	* 22 Nov 11	UNSATISFACTORY
	 3 May 11	SATISFACTORY
	20 Oct 10	SATISFACTORY


*Contested FA score.

On 6 Nov 13, the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB) 
disapproved the applicant’s request to remove her FAs dated 
22 Nov 11 and 25 Jan 13.  The specific reason for denial was 
there was insufficient evidence to support the claim (Exhibit 
C). 

________________________________________________________________


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial.  DPSIM states that the evidence 
provided is insufficient to support the applicant’s claim.  The 
applicant did not provide any documentation to support the basis 
for her request.  

The complete DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit B.

________________________________________________________________


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 6 Dec 13, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  
As of this date, this office has received no response.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has 
not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that 
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and 
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the 
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered 
with this application.

________________________________________________________________


The following members of the Board considered Docket Number    
BC-2013-01400 in Executive Session on 9 Jan 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 28 Feb 13.
    Exhibit B.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 26 Sep 13, w/atch.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 6 Nov 13.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Dec 13.



				Panel Chair