RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02296 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the selective reenlistment program (SRP)) be changed to allow entry into the Air Force Reserve (AFRES). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His RE code of 2X is an error and unjust because he received an honorable discharge and completed his required active service. His reentry code does not allow him the opportunity to serve in any reserve force and there are several available RE codes that would afford him that opportunity. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 29 Jul 03. On 8 Apr 08, the applicant’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR), rendered for the period 30 Mar 07 thru 29 Mar 08, was referred to him for a rating of “Does Not Meet” standards in section III, Fitness, and comments relating to his failed fitness assessment (FA). On 10 Apr 10, the applicant’s EPR, rendered for the period 30 Mar 09 thru 29 Mar 10, was referred to him for a rating of “Does Not Meet” standards in section III, Fitness, and comments relating to his failed FA. On 19 Oct 11, the applicant’s commander issued him an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, indicating he was not selected for reenlistment due to his FA failures. On the same day, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action. On 3 Nov 11, the applicant indicated he did not intend to appeal the non-selection for reenlistment. On 17 Nov 11, the applicant’s EPR, rendered for the period 30 Mar 11 thru 1 Nov 11, was referred to him for a rating of “Does Not Meet” standards in section III, Fitness, and a comments relating to his third FA failure. On 31 Mar 12, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “Completion of Required Active Service,” along with a separation program designator (SPD) code of JBK (expiration of term of service) and RE code of 2X. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. The applicant’s separation was due to being identified as eligible for the fiscal year 2012 (FY12) Air Force’s Force Shaping rollback program. His commander non-selected him for reenlistment and the applicant did not appeal his decision. In accordance with AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The SRP considers the member’s EPR ratings, unfavorable information from any substantiated source, and the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the airman’s ability (or lack thereof) to meet required training and duty performance levels. The applicant did not provide any evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in regards to his non-selection for reenlistment. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 24 Jul 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence or evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02296 in Executive Session on 27 Feb 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 8 May 13, w/atch. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 20 Jun 13. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jul 13. Panel Chair 2 3