RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-02915 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He would like to reenter the military. The applicant submits no supporting documentation. His complete submission is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant enlisted into the Regular Air Force on 18 Jan 11. The applicant’s commander recommended he be discharged under the provisions of AFI 36-3208, Chapter 5, Section 5D, entry-level performance or conduct, specifically for having a reluctance to make the effort necessary to meet Air Force standards of conduct and duty performance. After a legal review, the case was found to be legally sufficient. The applicant received a “2C” RE code and an entry-level separation after serving 4 months and 1 day on active duty. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which are at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial stating the applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to his RE code. His “2C” RE code was the correct code based on the applicant’s involuntary discharge. The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 7 Aug 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, this office has received no response. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We note that members separated from the Air Force are furnished an RE code predicated upon the quality of their service and circumstances of their separation. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was given an entry level separation for his performance and conduct. As a result, he was assigned an RE code of 2C. He has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe his entry level separation was improper or contrary to the provisions of the governing instruction, or the RE code was not appropriately assigned. In view of the foregoing, and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we conclude that no basis exists to recommend favorable action on the applicant’s request that his RE code of 2C be changed. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02915 in Executive Session on 27 Feb 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence for AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-02915 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 May 13. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 24 Jul 13. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Aug 13. 3 4