RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03464 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. Her Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS) date be updated to reflect her retirement points earned. 2. Her current Date of Rank (DOR) be changed from 1 June 2013, to 28 May 2009; the date she reentered the Regular Air Force 3. Her corrected record be given supplemental consideration for promotion to the rank of Master Sergeant (MSgt), E-7. 4. She receive all back pay due. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She had the required 10-years of active duty service to keep her Technical Sergeant (TSgt), E-6, rank when she reentered active duty but due to the system not being updated she had to step down to the rank of Staff Sergeant (SSgt), E-5. Since then, she has regained her TSgt rank, however, in the interim, she missed several opportunities for promotion. Due to an update in her records, she now has all the information and required days to regain her rank and correct her record. In support of her request the applicant submits copies of her DD Form 214s, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, her point credit summary report and documents pertaining to her service history. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 June 1995, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. She was released from active duty with an honorable characterization of service on 1 October 2002, and was credited with 7 years, 3 months and 4 days of active duty service. She enlisted in the Air Force Reserve on 2 October 2002, and was discharged on 27 May 2009, for transfer to the Regular Air Force on 28 May 2009. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. DPSIPE states that after a thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel record and supporting documentation provided, there is no error or injustice. They reaccomplished the applicant’s Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS)_ evaluation worksheet based upon her updated point credit summary report and deemed that she still does not meet the requirements in accordance with AFI 36- 2002, Regular Air Force and Special Category Accessions, paragraph Attachment 4, paragraph A4.2, Prior Service (PS) Date of Rank and Enlistment Grade: A.4.2.3. Minimum TAFMS requirements for enlistment in a higher pay grade than last held in the Regular Air Force or when last Regular component was non- USAF: A4.2.3.3., E-6, 10 years. The complete AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOE states they have no recommended action regarding supplemental consideration for promotion to the rank of Master Sergeant (MSgt), E-7. They have reviewed this case and determined that the applicant still does not meet the requirements to be advanced to the rank of Technical Sergeant (TSgt) at the time of active duty service entry. She was considered and selected for promotion to the rank of TSgt during cycle 12E6 and received a date of rank (DOR) of 1 June 2013. Based on this DOR, she will be eligible for promotion consideration to MSgt during cycle 15E7. The complete AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 18 February 2014, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). To date, a response has not been received. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered this application in Executive Session on 1 April 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03464 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149 dated 18 July 2013, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 25 October 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 30 December 2013. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 February 2014. 1 2