RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-03517

	XXXXXXXX	COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

The Fitness Assessment (FA) dated 20 Apr 13, be changed from “Unsatisfactory” to “Satisfactory” in the Air Force Fitness Management System (AFFMS).

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She sent medical documentation to her medical unit prior to the contested FA that should have exempted her from components of the assessment.  However, her 
medical unit never properly processed the documentation.  Therefore, her medical condition and the lack of exemptions precluded her from passing the FA.

In support of the appeal, the applicant submits a note from her medical provider, a Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance, and 
two AF Forms 469.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserve in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

On 19 Apr 13, the applicant provided a “Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance” signed by her medical provider and indicating 
that she was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal circumference (AC) component.  Additionally the 
memorandum exempted her from the push-up and sit-up components of the FA.




On 20 Apr 13, the applicant participated in the contested FA, attaining an overall composite score of 17.60, which constituted an “unsatisfactory” assessment.  The applicant was credited with the following component scores:  Cardio (1-Mile Walk) – Incomplete/0.00, Abdominal Circumference – 32”/17.60 points, Push-ups - Exempt, Sit-ups – Exempt.

The applicant provided an AF Form 469, Duty Limiting Condition Report, dated 5 May 13, but in an administrative note was effective as of 19 Apr 13.  The form indicated that she was medical cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal circumference (AC) component.  Additionally, the form exempted her from the push-up and sit-up component of the FA.  

On 14 Feb 14, a similar request was considered by the Fitness Assessment Appeals Board (FAAB).  The FAAB denied her request and stated, “the applicant did not complete the walk test, and did not provide documentation as to why they [sic] did not finish the test.”  

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial since the applicant did not provide a commander invalidation memorandum requesting the “Unsatisfactory” score be changed to “Satisfactory.”  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachments, is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 15 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days. 

As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.

3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  While the applicant has provided medical 
records confirming a medical condition, she has not met her burden of proving how this condition precluded her from successfully completing the contested 
FA.  In this respect, we note the “Fitness Screening Questionnaire Memorandum for Medical Clearance” signed by her medical provider and indicating that she 
was medically cleared to test on the cardio component (1-mile walk test) and the abdominal circumference (AC) component.  Additionally, we recognize the 
updated AF Form 469; however, both documents indicate the same limitations and do not provide evidence to support an error with the components she 
participated in during the contested FA.  Moreover, the applicant’s submission does not contain a letter from her commander requesting the FA be changed 
to “satisfactory” or invalidated.  Should the applicant provide such evidence, we would be willing to reconsider her request.  However, in view of the 
above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application.
________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a 
personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03517 in Executive Session on 24 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	XXXXXXXX, Chair
	XXXXXXXX, Member
	XXXXXXXX, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 5 Jun 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 15 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 14.
1 2