RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03945 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her deceased spouse’s record be corrected to show that he made a timely election for spouse and child coverage under the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her husband passed away on 31 January 2013. She did not sign a waiver concurring that her son was to receive the SBP. Her son is 19 years old and incapable of handling money. He does not have a job and is afraid to drive. She will always be responsible for her son’s welfare and the extra resources are needed to care for her son. In support of her appeal, the applicant provides a personal statement, the deceased member’s death certificate, marriage certificate, her birth certificate and a prior marriage divorce decree. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: Data extracted from the Air Force office of primary responsibility reflect the decedent retired on 1 October 1996. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPFFF recommends denial. Public Law (PL) 99-145, effective 1 March 1986, requires the spouse of a married member to concur in any SBP election that does not provide the maximum level of protection for the spouse. A married member who declines spouse coverage at retirement, may not provide SBP coverage for that spouse, or any spouse acquired following retirement, unless Congress authorizes an open enrollment. When child only SBP coverage is established, all eligible children are potential beneficiaries. Unmarried children remain eligible until age 18 or 22 if in school full-time. The laws controlling the SBP permits life-time eligibility for a child who is incapable of self-support if the disability occurred before the child attains age 18, or if the condition occurs between age 18 and 22 while the child is a full-time student. Marriage at any age terminates a handicapped child's eligibility for SBP payments. The decedent and the applicant were married, had a dependent child and he elected child only coverage based on a reduced level of retired pay. The applicant concurred in this election. The election form indicates their son is not disabled. The Defense Finance and Accounting Service records reflect the son as the eligible beneficiary. His eligibility will terminate on or before his 22nd birthday, if married at any time or, not a full-time student. The Defense Enrollment eligibility Reporting System does not reflect that the son is permanently incapable of self-support, but he does currently have a valid dependent ID card. On 16 October 2013, the applicant was asked to provide medical documents showing the date her son was first diagnosed, the nature and severity of the disability, if the disability is permanent, a doctor's statement stating whether or not the disability renders him incapable of self-support, and a statement verifying he has not married. In the event the applicant provides the requested documents, it would be appropriate to correct the decedent’s records to reflect his son is permanently incapable of self-support. The complete DPFFF evaluation is at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant forwarded her son’s medical and educational records and states he has suffered from learning disabilities since early childhood. This issue has created problems for him in a working environment, taking college courses and his fear of driving a car. Because of these things, she will need to support him. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and the recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion that that applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. While the applicant has provided medical documentation regarding her son, there is no evidence from a medical provider that her son is incabable of self support. Regrettably, we find no basis to grant the relief sought in the application. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. ________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-03945 in Executive Session on 7 August 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 9 Aug 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Decedent’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPFFF, dated 4 Nov 13. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jan 14. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant’s Response, dated 31 Dec 13, w/atchs. 1