RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04398
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be issued a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
From Active Duty, and a Uniformed Services Identification Card 
in conjunction with his separation from the Air Force Reserve.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was not issued a DD Form 214 and ID card when he was 
discharged from the Air Force Reserve.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

________________________________________________________________

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to a Points Credit Summary, dated 3 Apr 82, from 
10 May 69 to 29 Jan 82, the applicant served on active duty a 
total of 66 days.

________________________________________________________________

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating the applicant does not 
meet the criteria for a DD Form 214 and because he is no longer 
in the military, he is not eligible to receive a military ID 
card.

In accordance with AFI 36-3202, paragraph 4.5, Table 2, to 
receive a DD Form 214, a member must complete 90 days or more 
consecutive active duty days or one day or more if in support of 
a contingency operation.

Per DoDI 1000.13, Identification (ID) Cards for Members of the 
Uniformed Services, their Dependents, and Other Eligible 
Individuals, the applicant is no longer eligible to receive a 
Uniformed Services ID card.  In order to receive an ID card, the 
applicant would need to be currently serving or be retirement 
eligible.


A complete copy of the DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.

________________________________________________________________

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 13 Dec 13 for review and comment within 30 days.  
As of this date, no response has been received by this office 
(Exhibit D).

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation 
of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its 
rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not 
been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the 
absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.

________________________________________________________________

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.

________________________________________________________________

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04398 in Executive Session on 8 Jul 14, under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	               , Panel Chair
	               , Member
	               , Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2013-04398 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 13 Sep 13.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Available Master Personnel Records
	Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 3 Dec 13.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 13.




                                   
                                   Panel Chair