RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2013-04859

		COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reentry code (RE) of 2X (First Term, Second Term or Career Airman nonselected for reenlistment) be changed to an RE code in 
the 1 or 3 series to allow him to reenlist into military service. 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

As a result of being charged with disorderly conduct in Jun 12 he received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR), Unfavorable Information File 
(UIF) and a demotion in rank.  He completed all his Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention & Treatment (ADAPT) appointments and the 
necessary legal requirements to have misdemeanor dismissed.  He agreed to separate under the Rollback program as a faster means to 
join the Navy and was told by his superiors that he would be able to enlist in any other branch of service; however, the RE code he 
received bars him from reenlisting.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 13 Oct 09, the applicant commenced his enlistment in the Regular Air Force.

On 29 Mar 13, the applicant’s supervisor initiated an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment/Noncommissioned Officer Status 
Consideration, and nonrecommended the applicant for continued service.  His supervisor noted the applicant received a Letter of 
Reprimand (LOR) for drunk and disorderly conduct, urinating in 
public, and unlawful business conduct.  He received an LOR, 
Unfavorable Information File (UIF), placement on the control 
roster, and an administrative demotion.  It was further noted the 
applicant was selected to separate under the DOS Rollback program.  
The applicant acknowledged receipt and elected not to appeal 
nonselection for continued service.   



On 31 May 13, the applicant was honorably discharged and was 
credited with 3 years, 7 months and 18 days of active service.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an 
error or an injustice.  Under AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the 
USAF, commanders have selective reenlist selection or nonselection 
authority.  The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the 
service member’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, 
unfavorable information from any substantiated source, the 
servicemember’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards, 
and or the servicemember’s ability, or lack thereof, to meet 
required training and duty performance levels.  The applicant 
received an LOR for drunk and disorderly conduct, urinating in 
public, and unlawful business conduct.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant 
on 6 Jan 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As 
of this date, no response has been received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed..

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-04859 in Executive Session on 11 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 Nov 13, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 21 Jan 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 31 Mar 14.
1 2 3