RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05173 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her narrative reason for separation (Unsatisfactory Performance) and corresponding separation code (JHJ) be changed to a medical reason. Her reentry (RE) code of “2C” (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) be changed. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was medically unfit due to migraines and mental health issues caused by a concussion received during basic military training. In support of the applicant’s appeal, she provides medical documentation, DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty and other documentation. The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant's military personnel records could not be located. Therefore, the facts and circumstances surrounding her separation are not available. The following information was obtained from a copy of her DD Form 214. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 3 October 2001. On 6 March 2003, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of airman first class under the provisions AFI 36-3208. She served 1 year, 5 months and 3 on active duty. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. DPSOR states the separation code and narrative reason for separation listed on the applicant’s DD Form 214 are consistent with one another for this type of discharge. There is insufficient evidence contained within the applicant's military record to confirm the circumstances and facts surrounding the applicant's discharge. Absent the documentation, there is a presumption of regularity in which the applicant was afforded due process and the discharge was consistent with procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation. The applicant failed to submit any evidence that an error or injustice occurred in the processing of the discharge action. Therefore, the discharge to include the narrative reason for separation, SPD code, and characterization of service were consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge instruction and was within the discretion of discharge authority. The DPSOR complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. DPSOA the applicant does not provide any proof of an error or injustice in reference to her RE code, but wants to reenter the military. On 30 Dec 2013, AFPC/DPSOR validated the applicant's discharge processing with the limited records that were available. The RE code 2C is the correct RE code based on applicant's involuntary discharge with honorable character of service. The DPSOA complete evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 7 July 2014, copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. Due to the limited records available and based upon the presumption of regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs, we must assume that the applicant's discharge was proper and in compliance with appropriate directives. We find no evidence of error or injustice in the available records and without evidence to support the applicant's appeal we find no basis upon which to favorably consider this application. Therefore, in view of the foregoing, we conclude that no basis exists upon which to recommend favorable action on his request. 4. The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05173 in Executive Session on 4 September 2014, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Although XXXXXXXXXX chaired the panel, in view of her retirement, XXXXXXXXXX has agreed to sign as Acting Panel Chair. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 31 October 2013, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Available Master Personnel Record. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 30 December 2013. Exhibit D. Letter, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 5 February 2014. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 July 2014.