RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05352 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 12b, Separation Date This Period, be changed to reflect 27 Dec 06 rather than 6 Dec 06 [sic]. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was on leave until 27 Dec 06. His DD Form 214 should be changed to match the information reflected in the Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) records. In support of his request, the applicant provided a memo from the DVA. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 3 May 00, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 2 Dec 06, he was discharged from active duty. He is credited with six years, and seven months of total active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The applicant’s DD Form 214 and AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation both reflect his Date of Separation (DOS) as 2 Dec 06. DPSIPV has no reason to believe the applicant’s DOS was recorded in error. The complete DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit B. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Feb 14, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit C). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. In view of the above and in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05352 in Executive Session on 28 Aug 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05352 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Nov 13, w/atch. Exhibit B. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 10 Jan 14, w/atchs. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 14.