RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05415 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement, be corrected to reflect the same enlistment agreement that is contained in his AF Form 3007, Guaranteed Training Enlistment Agreement Non-Prior Service – United States Air Force. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF Form 3008, is missing the terms of enlistment agreement statement that he enlisted for six years and will be promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3) upon completion of technical training or completion of 20 weeks of training, whichever occurs first. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 14 May 13, the applicant enlisted in the Air Force for a period of six years. According to his AF Form 3007, Guaranteed Training Enlistment Agreement Non-Prior Service – United States Air Force, his enlistment agreement indicates that he would be promoted to the grade of airman first class upon completion of technical training or completion of 20 weeks of training, whichever occurs first. On 14 May 13, the applicant commenced his initial period of active service. The applicant was promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3), effective and with a date of rank of 12 Jul 13, eight weeks after commencing his initial enlistment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. The AF Form 3008 is used to supplement the AF Form 3007 if there are additional promises guaranteed to the applicant by any Air Force representative in regard to enlistment grade, job, training, future assignments, future promotions, and all other personnel actions. After thorough review of the applicant’s military personnel record and other supporting documentation, there appears to not be an error or injustice in determining his AF Form 3008 justifying change. The applicant’s grade of E-3 with a date of rank (DOR) 12 Jul 13 is correct and in compliance with the terms of his enlistment contract. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 21 Jul 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2013-05415 in Executive Session on 11 Sep 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Nov 13. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 22 Jan 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 21 Jul 14.