RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00113 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be upgraded to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed by his commanding officer, that once he earned his high school diploma he could request his characterization of discharge be upgraded. He understands that 56 years is a long time; however, the term “General” as his characterization of service does not sit well. In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal letter, a copy of his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, and a copy of an Honorable discharge certificate from the Navy Reserves, dated 15 May 55. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to documents extracted from his military personnel record, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 16 May 55. On 30 Nov 56, the applicant received an Article 15, Nonjudicial Punishment, for disorderly conduct. He was reduced in grade to airman basic. On 16 Jan 57, the applicant received an Article 15, Nonjudicial Punishment, for failure to repair. He received two hours of extra duty per day for a period of 14 days. On 24 Jan 57, the applicant received an Article 15, Nonjudicial Punishment, for being drunk. He received 15 days restriction. On 24 Jan 57, the applicant was recommended by his commander for discharge. The basis for this recommendation was the applicant exhibited an inability and/or lack of desire to learn plus the fact he has made no progress in training in his career field. On 4 Mar 57, the discharge authority approved a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. On 18 Apr 57, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 3 days of active service. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant on 8 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00113 in Executive Session on 10 Feb 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00113 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 13, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 14.