RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00330
		COUNSEL:  NONE
		HEARING DESIRED: NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His NGB Form 66, Extension of Enlistment in the Air National 
Guard and as a Reserve of the Air Force, reflect a 90-day 
extension rather than a 60-day extension.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The NGB Form 66 should reflect a 90-day extension as a 60-day 
extension was not authorized.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A. 


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in 
the grade of technical sergeant.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit B.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1PP recommends the 60-day extension be replaced with a six 
month or 180-day extension.  A1PP states they support the 
applicant’s claim insofar as his 60-day extension was not 
authorized.  .

ANGI 36-2002, Table 4.2 titled, “Terms of Extension to 
Enlistment,” identifies extension requirements for service 
members.  Rules two and three outline the requirements for said 
extensions.  Note two states, “Member may extend ANG enlistment 
for a period of at least 6 months to coincide with the MSO.” 
Note three expands this requirement by noting, “No extensions 
may be executed for a period of less than 6 months.” 

The records need to be corrected to meet the requirements 
outlined in ANGI 36-2002.  This will result in the applicant 
extending for a minimum of six months.  NGB/A1PP contacted the 
applicant’s unit and was informed they will extend his 
enlistment for six months and remove his 60-day extension as it 
was erroneous.

The complete NGB/A1PP evaluation is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 September 2014, a copy of the evaluation was forwarded to 
the applicant for review and response within 30 days (Exhibit 
C).  As of this date, no response has been received by this 
office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application is timely filed.

3.  Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  In this 
respect, the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) 
has indicated the applicant’s records should be corrected to 
meet the requirements outlined in the ANGI 36-2002 which will 
result in his enlistment executed on 24 January 2002 be extended 
for a minimum of six months.  We note the applicant has 
concurred with the recommended relief.  Therefore, we are in 
agreement with the OPR’s recommendation and recommend the 
applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below.


THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air 
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he 
executed an extension of his 24 January 2002 enlistment for a 
period of six (6) months rather than two (2) months.






The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-00330 in Executive Session on 8 January 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


All members voted to correct the records, as recommended.  The 
following documentary was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 January 2014, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, NGB/A1PP, dated 14 May 2014.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 September 2014.