RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00526
			COUNSEL:  NONE
			HEARING DESIRED:  NO


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) and Duty Title be 
changed to B12S3Y; Operations Officer, for the period 17 May 
2013 to 16 September 2013.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her records were not updated to reflect that she served as an 
Operations Officer.

In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of AF IMT 
2096, Classification/On-The-Job Training Action.

Her complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the 
grade of major (O-4).


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPAL recommends denial.  The operations officer position is 
considered a leadership position thus those selected for the 
position are done so through a “by name request” process which is 
initiated by the wing commander and approved by Air Force Special 
Operation Command (AFSOC).  AFSOC/Al confirmed that the applicant 
was only acting in that position during the period in question and 
a “by name request” seeking her for a permanent position was never 
initiated.  There is no precedent for awarding this DAFSC and duty 
title to officers acting in the operations officer role. 

The complete DPAL evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 15 May 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded 
to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days.  As of 
this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit 
D).


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing 
law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  We took notice 
of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of 
the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of 
the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the 
rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant 
has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, in 
the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to 
recommend granting the relief sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly 
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.


The following members of the Board considered this application in 
Executive Session on 9 December 2014, under the provisions of AFI 
36-2603:

      , Panel Chair
      , Member
      , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2014-
00526 was considered:

    Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 January 2014, w/atch.
    Exhibit B.  Applicant’s Master Personnel Records.
    Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPAL dated 1 April 2014.
    Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 May 2014.