RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00700 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His retirement pay be adjusted to account for public service performed as a Temporary Early Retirement Authority (TERA) retiree. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he did not complete the required paperwork prior to the end of TERA, he wants public service credit for his years of work in the Public and Community arena for the recomputation of his retired pay. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is a former service member who retired on 1 Jul 95 under TERA and was credited with 15 years, 9 months, and 6 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While DMDC indicates that retirees may not have been properly advised on the program and that relief should be granted when feasible, AFPC/DPSOR indicates that it appears the applicant was aware and properly notified of the program prior to his retirement. There is no evidence showing the applicant filed the required paperwork for the program within the required timeframe. Furthermore there is no evidence the applicant was not properly notified of the program prior to his retirement. Under the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 1993 (FY93 NDAA), Public Law (PL) 102-484, 23 Oct 92, Congress enacted the TERA, which permitted selected military members to retire early and accrue additional military retirement credits if they gained employment with qualifying public or community service organizations. Qualifying public and community service job vacancies included education, conservation, environment protection, law enforcement, and public health care positions. However, service members were required to register for the program prior to retirement and there are no provisions under law to retroactively register for employment in public or community service organizations. Furthermore, in order for the qualifying public and community service work to be creditable towards recomputation of retired pay, such work had to take place during the period between the applicant’s retirement from active duty (1 Jul 95) and the date the member would have attained 20 years of active service (24 Oct 98). Properly registered applicants were required to turn in proof of qualifying public or community service to the Defense Manpower Data Center (DMDC) not later than one year after they would have reached 20 years of Total Active Federal Military Service (TAFMS) had they been continuously on active duty. The applicant retired on 1 Jul 95; therefore, he must have completed any creditable service prior to 24 Oct 98, and attempted to claim credit for such service prior to 24 Oct 99. The evidence provided indicates the applicant was briefed on the program requirements prior to his retirement, but, for whatever reason, did not timely file his claim for credit. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00700 in Executive Session on 27 Jan 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 6 Aug 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Aug 14.