RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00822 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge be updated to Honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged over 31 years ago, when he was very young. He would like his discharge updated so he may take advantage of educational benefits provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 18 Jul 83. On 10 Jan 84, the applicant admitted in a sworn statement to smoking marijuana. On 1 May 84, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) and establishment of an Unfavorable Information File (UIF) for admitting to smoking marijuana. On 9 May 84, the applicant was notified by his commander he was being recommended for discharge pursuant of AFR 39-10, Separation Upon Expiration of Term of Service, for Convenience of Government, Minority, Dependency and Hardship, Chapter 5, Section H, paragraph 5.49c for his admitted use of marijuana. On 14 May 1984, after consulting with counsel, the applicant waived his rights to an administrative discharge board contingent upon his receipt of no less than a general (under honorable conditions) discharge. On 18 May 84, the Staff Judge Advocate reviewed and found the discharge package legally sufficient. They recommended a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge. On 30 May 84, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited with 10 months and 13 days of active service. A request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Apr 14, for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, in the absence of any evidence related to the applicant’s post-service activities, there is no way for us to determine if the applicant’s accomplishments since leaving the service are sufficiently meritorious to overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00822 in Executive Session on 21 Nov 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Feb 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Information Bulletin - Clemency.