RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-00839 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect combat and deployment dates for Iraq (1 Jul 04-31 Oct 04) and Saudi Arabia (Feb 01-Apr 01). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His deployment and combat dates are not reflected on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 Jul 86, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Air Force. According to his DD Form 214 issued in conjunction with his 1 Aug 06 retirement, he was credited with 20 years and 6 days of active service. He was also credited with 6 years, 4 months and 13 days of Foreign Service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. There is no authority under either DoD or Air Force directives to grant the requested action. AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, is the authority for what can and cannot be included on a DD Form 214. The inclusion of combat and deployment dates and/or locations is not an authorized entry by the Air Force or authorized under the parent publication, DoDI 1336.01. The applicant failed to prove the DD Form 214 was published in error by the omission of combat or deployment dates/locations. The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00839 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Feb 14. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 4 Jun 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Aug 14.