RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-00998

	 		COUNSEL:  NONE INDICATED

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His records be corrected to reflect his enlisted duty history.  



APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His enlisted active duty and deployment history was accidentally omitted from his records when he was commissioned as an officer.  His records must reflect his total service for consideration by the Air Force’s Force Shaping Boards (FSB).  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.



STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 5 September 1991.  

On 09 May 1999, the applicant was honorably discharged in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5), with a narrative reason for separation of “Completion of Required Active Service,” and was credited with seven years, eight months, and five days of total active service.  

On 25 June 2001, the applicant enlisted into the Air Force Reserve (AFRES) and discharged on 24 February 2010.  

On 25 February 2010, under Reserve Order D-0241, dated 1 April 2010, the applicant was commissioned into the Air Force Reserve and then placed on extended active duty on 23 May 2010.  

The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of captain (O-3).  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.  



AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPTOS recommends denial.  Air Force officers with prior enlisted service will not maintain their enlisted duty history in the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS).  In addition, temporary duty history is not updated in an Airman’s duty history.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPTOS evaluation is at Exhibit C.



APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the applicant on 19 September 2014 for review and comment within 30 days.  As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D).



THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.



THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.



The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-00998 in Executive Session on 6 January 2015, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 February 2014, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPTOS, dated 22 April 2014.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 19 September 2014.