RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01055 OUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Air Force Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement, United States Air Force, Block E, dated 6 Dec 11, be changed to reflect that he enlisted in the pay grade of E-3. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He met the basic eligibility requirements to enlist in the pay grade of E-3 per AFRSI 36-2001, Recruiting Procedures for the Air Force, Chapter 2.22. He met the requirement of having a minimum of 45 college semester credits prior to his initial enlistment, but due to no fault of his own the updated transcript was not made available to the recruiter. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 6 Dec 11, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force in the grade of E-1. He is currently serving in the grade of E-3. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with AFRSI 36-2001, members will enlist under the pay grade E-3/A1C if they have satisfactorily completed 45 semesters hours or 67 quarter hours of credit from an accredited, degree-granting institution listed in the applicable Accredited Institutions of Post-Secondary Education (AIPE) directory for last year attended. The applicant provided transcripts from the University of Maryland University College and from Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University showing completion of 32 and 10 semester hours respectively. The status of one course, Dantes Substance Abuse, has not been given an accreditation or grade by the University per the transcript. Therefore, he has a total of 42 college credits, not the 45 needed. The complete DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation(s) was forwarded to the applicant on 5 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01055 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 3 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIP, dated 5 May 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Jul 14.