RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01100 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Reentry (RE) code “4F” (Five or more days lost time during current enlistment) be changed to a “1” series to allow him to reenter the military. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His military record does not support restricting him from reenlisting in the United States military. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects the applicant had lost time from 24 Feb 09 through 9 Apr 09. On 20 Aug 10, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation as “Completion of Required Active Service” with a separation code of “KBK” and a Reentry code of “4F.” He was credited with 5 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant’s DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, states he has 47 days of lost time. Based on this lost time, his RE code is accurate. Any component of the military can waive his RE “4F” code to allow him to reentry the military, if they chose to. This code does not “bar” a member from reentering the military. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 22 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01100 in Executive Session on 16 Dec 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Excerpt from Military Personnel Record Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 7 May 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 22 Sep 14.