RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01137 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His grade of Sergeant (Sgt/E-4) be changed to Staff Sergeant (SSgt/E-5). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: After his discharge, he was retroactively awarded two decorations which would have resulted in his having been promoted to E-5 before his discharge had they been awarded on time. After his 6 Nov 70 discharge, he was awarded the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) on 6 Jul 09 and the Purple Heart (PH) Medal on 15 Jan 10. The PH was worth 5 points toward promotion and the AFCM was worth 3 points toward promotion. He was promoted to E-4 on 1 Jan 69. These additional points combined with his outstanding enlisted performance reports (EPR) would have resulted in his being promoted to E-5 before his discharge. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 8 Nov 66. On 1 Jan 69, the applicant was promoted to the grade of E-4. On 6 Nov 70, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge in the grade of E-4, and was credited with 3 years, 11 months, and 29 days of active service. On 6 Jul 09, the applicant was awarded the AFCM for meritorious service on 20 Mar 69. On 15 Jan 10, the applicant was awarded the PH for wounds received in action on 20 Mar 69. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOE recommends denial due to the untimely filing of this application. Beginning in 1970, airmen were considered for promotion under the Weighted Airman Performance System (WAPS). To be considered for promotion to SSgt, an individual must have 12-months time-in-grade, possess a skill level commensurate with their Air Force Special Code (AFSC), have a current Promotion Fitness Examination (PFE) and Specialty Knowledge Test (SKT) scores, and be recommended by the promotion authority. These were the minimum eligibility requirements to be considered for promotion, but in no way guaranteed promotion. WAPS is composed of six weighted factors (SKT, PFE, EPRs, time-in-grade, time-in-service, and decorations). The combined score of these weighted factors must be at or above the cutoff score required for each individual’s AFSC in order to be selected for promotion. Based upon the applicant’s 1 Jan 69 date for rank to Sgt, he would have been eligible for promotion consideration to SSgt under the WAPS beginning with promotion cycle 71A5. However, in accordance with AFMAN 37-139, Records Disposition Schedule, Table 36-22, Rule 29, promotion history files are only maintained for a period of 10 years. Due to the passage of time, it is not possible to verify whether the applicant was considered for promotion to SSgt, or if the addition of the PH and AFCM would have rendered him a selectee. The applicant’s request concerns a matter dating back almost 44 years. Recommend the request be time barred due to the lack of official documentation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He believes that even though his request is 44 years old, it has merit. He had a date for promotion to SSgt under the WAPS system in 1970, and if he had reenlisted he would have been promoted. Due to the fact that he was not awarded the PH and AFCM in 2009 and 2010, timing should be waived. He reiterates that his EPRs at the time were outstanding (Exhibit E). FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. While the applicant contends that the decision to award him the Air Force Commendation Medal (AFCM) and Purple Heart (PH) Medal in 2009 and 2010, respectively, should somehow cause this Board to waive timeliness, we note that the corrections to his record giving rise to the instant request were also more than three years ago. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01137 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 14 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Jan 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOE, dated 14 Apr 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 14. Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 8 Aug 14.