RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01168 COUNSEL:	NONE
HEARING DESIRED:	NO

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The narrative reason (adjustment disorder) of his entry level separation and Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code be changed to allow him to rejoin another branch of the military.

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
He was told, during his discharge procedures, he would be allowed to reenlist in a different branch of the military; however, a Navy recruiter told him he has an [RE] code that does not allow him to reenlist. He further contends he is medically cleared by his civilian medical provider of any anxiety issues that caused his separation from the Air Force.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 23 Apr 13, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.
On 29 Apr 13, the applicant was seen at the Behavioral Analysis Service (BAS) for anxiety and depression. The clinical psychologist recommended the applicant’s diagnosis of Axis I - adjustment disorder with depressed mood does not meet retention standards for continued military service. The applicant acknowledged, and agreed with the results of the diagnosis the same day.

On 7 May 13, the applicant’s commander notified him that he was recommending him to be discharged under authority of AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, for conditions that interfere with military service and that the resulting discharge would be described as an entry level separation and the applicant will be ineligible for reenlistment in the Air Force.

On 7 May 13, the applicant acknowledged the discharge notification and waived his right to counsel, or to submit statements on his own behalf.

On 8 May 13, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s administrative discharge.

On 9 May 13, the applicant was furnished an entry level separation with uncharacterized service and was credited with 17 days of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and E.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on the applicant’s mental health diagnosis of Axis I - adjustment disorder with depressed mood; Axis II - 799.9 deferred; Axis III - deferred to medical record, the applicant’s commander acted within his authority to discharge him under AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen. Therefore, the Separation Program Designator (SPD) code, narrative reason for separation, and character of service was consistent with the pertinent discharge instructions.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The applicant stated he has grown and matured a lot since he was discharged from the military. The stressors that were in his life prior to basic training are no longer in his life. He expressed extreme dedication to returning to military service and improving his life by serving others (Exhibit E).

ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
The AFBCMR Medical Consultant recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice in the applicant’s discharge. The Medical Consultant acknowledges the applicant’s removal from the source of the stressor [basic military training] is likely to result in normal behavior; however, returning the applicant to a military environment makes the applicant vulnerable to a recurrence of the maladaptive behavior that resulted in his discharge. The Medical Consultant further indicates the brief statement from the applicant’s civilian health care provider is insufficient evidence of his wellness and suitability to return to

military service; therefore, the applicant has not met the burden of proof to warrant the requested change to his military record.

A complete copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation is at Exhibit F.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit G). As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1.	The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.	The application was timely filed.
3.	Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case, including his rebuttal response; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the AFBCMR Medical Consultant, and the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Specifically, the Board believes the applicant’s commander acted within his authority to discharge him and the character of service was consistent with the pertinent discharge instructions. Further, the Board agrees with the AFBCMR Medical Consultant that insufficient evidence was presented of his suitability to return to service. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01168 in Executive Session on 26 Aug 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A.	DD Form 149, dated 27 Jan 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B.	Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.	Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 9 Apr 14. Exhibit D.	Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 28 Jul 15.
Exhibit E.	Letter, Applicant, dated 30 Aug 14. Exhibit F.	Memorandum, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 14. Exhibit G.	Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Dec 14.
Exhibit H.	Memorandum, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Jun 15. Exhibit I.	Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 Jun 15.