RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF:               DOCKET NUMBER:  BC-2014-01398
				COUNSEL:  NONE
				HEARING DESIRED:  YES


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His record be corrected to reflect a year of satisfactory 
service for retirement from 1995 thru 1998.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He was not fully credited with points to include satisfactory 
years of service for retirement.

The applicant's complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in 
the grade of lieutenant colonel.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application, 
extracted from the applicant’s military records, are contained 
in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air 
Force at Exhibit B.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/A1K recommends denial.  A1K states the applicant has 
provided copies of AF Forms 40A for the inclusive period in 
question; however, there is no evidence to support the claim 
that he was authorized to perform the duty and that the approved 
AF Forms 40A were submitted as required in accordance with AFI 
36-2254V1.  Thus, in the absence of the required signed 
documentation by the appropriate approval authorities.  
Specifically, the applicant's supervisor and IMA program manager 
at the time, for the period of time that is being claimed; the 
command’s basis for disapproval is established.

The complete A1K evaluation is at Exhibit B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

On 1 October 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was 
forwarded to the applicant for review and response within 
30 days (Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office. 


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application is timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the applicant’s 
complete submission, we are not persuaded the record warrants 
the requested correction.  The applicant’s contentions are duly 
noted; however, he has not provided evidence to override the 
rationale provided by the Air Force office of primary 
responsibility (OPR).  Therefore, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the OPR and adopt its rationale as the basis 
for our conclusion that the applicant has not been the victim of 
an error or injustice.   In the absence of evidence to the 
contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief 
sought in this application. 

4.  The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not 
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel 
will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  
Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably 
considered.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.







The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01398 in Executive Session on 5 February 2015, 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:


The following documentary evidence was considered:

  Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 March 2014, w/atchs.
  Exhibit B.  Letter, AFRC/A1K, dated 9 July 2014.
  Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 October 2014.