RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01492 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be corrected to reflect 9968 Marlin Drive, Dallas, Texas 75228. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The HOR reflected on his DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, was his father’s address, not his address. In support of his request, the applicant provides his DD Form 214, Special Order AB-8705, Assignment, AF Form 973, Request and Authorization for Change of Administrative Orders, and AF Form 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, showing where he entered the Air Force. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 30 Jun 69. The applicant’s DD Form 4, Enlistment Contract Armed Forces of the United States, reflects Texarkana, Arkansas as HOR. On 3 Jan 76, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with 6 years, 6 months, and 4 days of active service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects 1205 Jackson Street, Texarkana, Arkansas as his HOR. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), Volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1 states, “The place recorded as the home of record of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commission, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day, may the member change the HOR.” AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the applicant initialed his DD Form 4 on 30 Jun 69, as well as subsequent enlistment documents listing Texarkana, Arkansas as his HOR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01492 in Executive Session on 13 Jan 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 7 May 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 Sep 14.