RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01503 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standard for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void enlistments) be changed to allow reentry in the military. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She does not have symptomatic anemia, the condition for which she was discharged. She has no medical history of this issue and can prove that she does not have it now. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 29 Oct 13. On 20 Nov 13, the applicant’s commander notified her that he was recommending her for discharge for erroneous enlistment. The reason for this action was a medical narrative summary, dated 15 Nov 13, that found the applicant did not meet minimum medical standards to enlist; specifically, that the applicant had anemia. On 20 Nov 13, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and waived her rights to consult with legal counsel or submit statements on her own behalf. On 21 Nov 13, the action was found to be legally sufficient and, on 22 Nov 13, the discharge authority concurred with the commander’s recommendation. On 25 Nov 13, the applicant was furnished an entry-level separation with uncharacterized service, with a RE code of 4C. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AETC/SGPS recommends denial as it pertains to the applicant’s medical diagnosis, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on the documentation on file in the applicant’s records, the separation was carried out in accordance with established policy and administrative procedures. If she continues to have normal lab results she may re-apply through her recruiter for a waiver consideration and if granted re-enter military service. A complete copy of the AETC/SGPS evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial of the applicant’s request for an RE code that would make her eligible to reenlist. The applicant was involuntarily discharged for Failed Medical/Physical Procurement Standards after serving 27 days of active service. She received an erroneous RE code on his DD Form 214 of 4C (Separated for concealment of juvenile records, minority, failure to meet physical standards for enlistment, failure to attain a 9.0 reading grade level as measured by the Air Force Reading Abilities Test, or void enlistments). Her correct RE code is 2C (Involuntarily separated with an honorable discharge; or entry level separation without characterization of service) as required by AFI 36-2606, Reenlistments in the USAF, based on her entry level separation with uncharacterized service. The RE code 2C is required based on the entry level separation with uncharacterized service and applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or injustice in reference to her RE code. If otherwise eligible, the component applicant desires to enter should approve a waiver if they desire her services as supported by HQ AETC/SGPS. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correcting the applicant’s records to make her immediately eligible for reenlistment. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an injustice with respect to her eligibility for enlistment. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant should have been issued an RE code of 2C in conjunction with her entry-level separation with uncharacterized service and will correct her records administratively. While we note that said administrative correction will not result in the applicant being eligible for immediate re-enlistment, the applicant is free to pursue an enlistment waiver through the service or component of her choice. Whether or not she is successful in obtaining an enlistment waiver will be based entirely on the needs of the service, provided she is otherwise qualified. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01503 in Executive Session on 18 Dec 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01503 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 13 Mar 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AETC/SGPS, dated 28 Apr 14. Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 16 May 14. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 04 Aug 14.