RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01576 COUNSEL: NO HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His pay date be corrected to reflect 25 September 2001 instead of 29 September 2001. His records corrected to reflect his pay date adjusted by one day, if it is not changed from 25 September 2001 to 29 September 2001. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was informed that his pay date may have been changed because he was detained and held by Colorado Springs Corrections. However, he was detained for only one day which does not explain why his pay date was changed by five days. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant’s military personnel records indicate he enlisted in the Regular Air Force on 25 September 2001. On 18 November 2010, a CMS 2098, Duty Status Change, was initiated indicating the applicant was arrested by civilian authorities and placed in civilian confinement, effective 24 October 2010. On 18 November 2010, a CMS 2098 was initiated releasing the applicant from civilian confinement, effective 28 October 2010. The applicant incurred a total of four lost days for this incident and current enlistment. According to the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), the applicant’s pay date is reflected as 29 September 2001. On 4 March 2012, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with 10 years, 5 months, and 10 days of active service this period. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial. The applicant’s pay date and total active federal military service date (TAFMSD) were adjusted to reflect the four days he was charged for lost time. The documentation submitted by the applicant does not necessarily show the entire period of time he was in confinement. Therefore, we have no reason to believe he was not charged with the appropriate amount of lost time. Furthermore, after a thorough review of the applicant’s record, it was determined his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, Block 29, Dates of Time Lost During This Period, should reflect “24 October 2010 through 27 October 2010” instead of “NONE”. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: He argues that a notarized bond agreement which was signed by himself and the deputy sheriff indicates that he was released from confinement on 26 October 2010. His paperwork was seen and filed by the court clerk one day later, on 27 October 2010. This block does not show his release and it does not state or prove anything except that the Clerk of the Court stamped the document on that specific date. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was not timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice to warrant changing the applicant’s pay date. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, we do not find the evidence provided sufficient to override the rationale provided by the Air Force office of primary responsibility. Thus, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. We note AFPC/DPSIV recommends the Board direct correction of the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect the lost time of 24 October 2010 through 27 October 2010. However, the Board’s charter extends solely to the correction of records, which are not conceivably detrimental to the applicant. As such, the Board will take no action in this regard. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01576 in Executive Session on 3 February 2015, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member Due to the retirement of the Panel Chair, XXXXX has agreed to sign as Acting Panel Chair. The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 April 2014, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 22 May 2014, w/atchs. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 September 2014. Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated, 19 October 2014, w/atch. 3