RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01684

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Michigan to 
Mississippi.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The address is no long valid, it is in error, and needs to be 
updated.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant commenced her service in the Regular Air Force on 
21 Aug 09 and served on active duty until 2 Jun 14, when she was 
honorably discharged.  According to both her AF Form 24, 
Application for Appointment as Reserve of the Air Force or USAF 
Without Component, dated 3 Aug 09, and her DD Form 214, 
Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, her HOR is 
reflected as Monroe, MI.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPANF recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The Joint Federal Travel Regulation 
(JFTR), volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, states, “The place 
recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, 
reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded 
when commission, appointed, enlisted, or inducted, or ordered 
into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service 
of more than one full day.  Only if a break in service exceeds 
one full day, may the member change the HOR.”  The HOR is the 
location identified by the individual upon entering the service, 
not a location where the individual is later assigned or a 
location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully 
justified.  Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR 
will not.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPANF evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01684 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	
The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01684 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 16 April 2014.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPANF, dated 15 May 2014.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 August 2014.