RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01753 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general (under honorable conditions) discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He has been a productive person in the civilian work force, has changed his lifestyle, and has been recognized by his peers and managers for making a difference in his work environment. The applicant provides evidence in support of his appeal consisting of an annual performance review, letter of outstanding achievement, and a character reference letter from his supervisor. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 12 Jan 79. This discharge period is covered from 3 Nov 82 through 10 Dec 87. On 26 Oct 87, the applicant was notified by his commander of his intent to recommend his discharge for commission of a serious offense (drug abuse) under the provisions of AFR 39-10, Paragraph 5-49c. The reason for the action was that on or about 17 Aug 87, the applicant wrongfully used marijuana (positive urinalysis) in violation of Article 112a of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), for which he received an Article 15 on 8 Oct 87. On 29 Oct 87, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action and of his right to consult with legal counsel. He subsequently submitted a request for a conditional waiver of administrative discharge board proceedings, provided he receive no less than a general discharge. On 10 Dec 87, the applicant was furnished a general discharge, and was credited with 8 years, 10 months, and 29 days of total active service. On 30 Apr 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant of review and comment within 30 days. In response, the applicant provided a copy of his FBI report (Exhibits C and D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we find no evidence of an error or injustice that occurred in the discharge processing. Based on the available evidence of record, it appears the discharge was consistent with the substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and within the commander's discretionary authority. The applicant has provided no evidence which would lead us to believe the characterization of the service was contrary to the provisions of the governing regulation, unduly harsh, or disproportionate to the offenses committed. In the interest of justice, we considered upgrading the discharge based on clemency; however, we do not find the evidence presented is sufficient for us to conclude that the applicant’s post-service activities overcome the misconduct for which he was discharged. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01753 in Executive Session on 18 Dec 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 24 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFBCMR, dated 30 Apr 14. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, undated, w/atch.