RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01786 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Virginia Beach, VA. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was recently married and no longer has family at her previous HOR. Her driver’s license is now from the state of Virginia and her husband’s HOR is also listed as Virginia. In support of her request, the applicant provides a copy of her driver’s license. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant contracted her initial enlistment in the Regular Air Force on 17 May 2012. Her DD Form 4, Enlistment - Reenlistment Document, reflects Asheville, NC as her HOR. THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial. After a thorough review of the applicant's military personnel record and other supporting documentation, there appears to be no error or injustice regarding her HOR. The DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR. Joint Federal Travel Regulation Volume I, Appendix A1, Part 1, states in part that a HOR is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Any correction must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the member's convenience. The applicant's DD Form 4, reflects Asheville, NC as her HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 20 June 2014, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt the rationale expressed as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the relief sought in this application. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that the application was denied without a personal appearance; and that the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR BC-2014- 01786 in Executive Session on 12 March 2015, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR BC-2014- 01786 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 16 April 2014, w/atch. Exhibit B. Applicant’s Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 27 May 2014. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 20 June 2014.