RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01804

					COUNSEL:  NONE

		HEARING DESIRED:  NO



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) code of “2X” (First-term, 
second-term or career airman considered but not selected for 
reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program) be 
changed so he may reenter the military.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He has tried to enlist in the Navy, Army, and Air National Guard 
since his separation but cannot with the current RE code of 2X.  
He takes great pride in his military service and wishes to 
continue serving in another branch of the military.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 5 Jul 11, the applicant initially entered the Regular Air 
Force.

On 20 Jun 13, the applicant’s commander did not recommended him 
for re-enlistment due to once falling asleep on duty, for which 
he received a letter of reprimand and for once violating a 
curfew, for which he received nonjudicial punishment.

On 21 Jun 13, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the action 
and declined to appeal the commander’s decision.

On 20 Sep 13, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge 
with an RE code of 2X, and was credited with 2 years, 2 months, 
and 16 days of active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  In accordance with AFI 36-2606, 
Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment 
selection or non-selection authority.  The Selective 
Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members Enlisted 
Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from 
any substantiated source, the airman's willingness to comply 
with Air Force standards and/or the airman's ability (or lack 
thereof) to meet required training and duty performance levels.  
The applicant had a history of unsatisfactory performance and 
the commander acted within his authority under the governing 
instruction.  Further, the applicant did not appeal the 
commander’s decision rendered.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

?

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01804 in Executive Session on 28 Jan 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:





The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01804 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 10 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 9 Jun 14.
Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.