RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01823 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 11, Primary Specialty, be corrected to reflect his awarded five skill level. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214 does not reflect the award of his five skill level. He completed all required upgrade training and was awarded a new Primary AFSC of 2A352 on 30 Nov 11. In support of his request, the applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 29 Jan 08. On 30 Nov 11, the applicant’s commander signed an AF Form 2098, Classification/On-the-Job-Training Action awarding a new Primary AFSC of 2A352. On 28 Jan 12, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with 4 years of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is included at Exhibits C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIC recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or injustice. A review of the applicant’s official military record confirms award of the AFSC 2A352; however, there is no documentation to support he performed duty in that skill level. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an injustice. After a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicant’s complete submission, we believe the applicant is the victim of an injustice. While we note the comments of AFPC/DPSIC indicating that relief should be denied because they could not find any documentation to support the applicant performed duty in that skill level, we believe a preponderance of the evidence substantiates that corrective action is warranted. In this respect, we note the applicant was awarded his five skill level on 30 November 2011 which supports the applicant’s contention that his records are in error. Therefore, we recommend the applicant’s records be corrected as indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that on 28 January 2012, his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Item 11, Primary Specialty, be amended to include 2A352B, Integrated Avionics Systems Attack/Special Craftsman, CV-22, F-16, 3 Years and 10 Months. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01823 in Executive Session on 7 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01823 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIC, dated 20 Jun 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 14.