RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01998 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The following items on his DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected: a. Item 26 – Separation Code: JKN. b. Item 27 – Reentry Code: 2B. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His record does not reflect enough derogatory information to warrant the type of codes currently reflected on his DD Form 214. In support of his request, the applicant has provided a copy of his DD Form 214, a copy of AETC Form 125A, Record of Administrative Training Action, dated 17 Oct 13, a copy of a Letter of Reprimand, dated 26 Sep 13, a copy of AF Form 3070A, Record of Nonjudicial Punishment (AB thru TSgt), dated 21 Aug 13, a copy of his Administrative Discharge Package, a copy of his Combat Control Selection Course - Certificate of Training, dated 5 Dec 12, and a copy of his Airman Leadership Class - Certificate of Training, dated 14 Jan 13. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 29 Aug 12. On 26 Sep 13, the applicant received a Letter of Reprimand (LOR) for failing to obey Air Education and Training Command Instruction 36-2216, Administration of Military Standards and Discipline Training, by using tobacco products in uniform. He violated this policy when he was found smoking in uniform in the student parking lot. The applicant waived his right to respond. On 27 Aug 13, the applicant accepted an Article 15, Nonjudicial Punishment, for wrongfully possessing and consuming alcohol in the student dormitory, wrongfully entered the room of a member of the opposite sex, and consuming alcohol while under the age of 21 in violations of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice and Texas Alcoholic Beverage Code, Section 106.04. The applicant was reduced in grade to airman, restricted to the limits of Joint Base San Antonio-Lackland for 15 days, and Reprimanded. On 23 Oct 13, the applicant was notified by his commander that she intended to recommend him for discharge for Minor Disciplinary Infractions in accordance with AFI 36-3208, Administrative Separation of Airmen, Chapter 5, paragraph 5.49. She also recommended the applicant’s service be characterized as General (Under Honorable Conditions). On 25 Oct 13, the applicant consulted legal counsel and waived his right to submit statement on his behalf. The Staff Judge advocate reviewed the case file and found no errors or irregularities prejudicial to the applicant’s substantive or procedural rights. They recommended approval. On 29 Oct 13, the discharge authority reviewed the case file and approved a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge without probation and rehabilitation. On 30 Oct 13, the applicant was furnished a General (Under Honorable Conditions) discharge, and was credited with 1 year, 2 months, and 2 days of active service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects a Separation Code of “JKN” and a Reentry Code of “2B” The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on a review of the master personnel records, the discharge, to include the Separation Code, Narrative Reason for Separation and Character of Service, was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements for the discharge instruction and within the discretion of the discharge authority. The applicant’s commander afforded him every opportunity to overcome his deficiencies and concluded he failed to correct his behavior and refused to comply with Air Force standards. Based on this assessment, discharge was warranted. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The applicant was involuntarily discharged for Misconduct and based on the applicant’s Character of Service his record required a Reentry Code of 2B. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 6 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01998 in Executive Session on 25 Jun 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-01998 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 1 May 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 23 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 14 Oct 14. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Feb 15.