RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02074 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect the following Air Force Medals and or Ribbons: a. Korean Defense Service Medal (KDSM) - (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED) b. Vietnam Training Medal, Second Class APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was awarded the Vietnam Training Medal, Second Class and it is not reflected on his DD Form 214. Additionally, the KDSM was approved for wear after he retired and his service in Korea between Nov 76 and Nov 77 warrant the approval of the KDSM. He would like to have a new DD Form 214 issued showing all awards and decorations received while in the service so that he can pass them to his heirs. In support of his request, the applicant provides copies of his DD Form 214, Citation and Order Number for the Vietnam Training Medal and eligibility criteria for the Korean Defense Service Medal. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 5 Jun 61. On 31 Jan 86, the applicant retired with an Honorable discharge, and was credited with 24 years, 7 months, and 26 days of active service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - Distinguished Flying Cross - Meritorious Service Medal with 1 device - Air Medal with 3 devices - Air Force Commendation Medal - Air Force Achievement Medal - Small Arms Marksmanship Ribbon with 1 device - NCO PME Ribbon - National Defense Service Medal - Vietnam Service Medal - Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross Medal with 1 device - Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal - Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with 7 devices - Air Force Longevity Service Ribbon with 5 devices - Air Force Good Conduct Medal with 6 devices The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the Vietnam Service Medal Second Class, indicating it is a foreign award and not authorized for acceptance, therefore there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. Based on a review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, they were able to determine the below Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons should have been awarded: - Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars - Korean Defense Service Medal Upon final Board decision, administrative correction of the applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 12 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect the award of the Vietnam Service Medal, Second Class. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. We note the Air Force OPR has determined the applicant’s eligibility for the Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars and the Korean Defense Service Medal and will correct the records administratively. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02074 in Executive Session on 7 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02074 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 12 May 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 25 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 12 Nov 14.