RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02082 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Branson, Missouri. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She enlisted in the military in 2002 from Los Angeles, California. Her family moved to Branson, Missouri in 2004 and she has no family, friends, home, or next of kin in or near California. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant commenced her service in the Regular Air Force on 19 Nov 02. According to her DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, her (HOR) is listed as Laguna Niguel, CA. The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of Technical Sergeant (E-6). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The DD Form 4, Enlistment/ Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States is the source document for Home of Record (HOR) and Place of Entry (POE). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, states, “The place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commission, appointed, enlisted, or inducted, or ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day, may the member change the HOR.” The HOR is the location identified by the individual upon entering the service, not a location where the individual is later assigned or a location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully justified. Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR will not. AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that her initialed DD Form 4/1, dated 21 Jun 02, as well as subsequent enlistment documents listed Laguna Niguel, CA 92677 as her HOR. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02082 in Executive Session on 19 Feb 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 14 May 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 27 May 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.