RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02084 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He have 11 days of lost leave restored. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to the retirement of the Security Forces Manager and the departure of the Security Forces Commander in FY13, he was unable to take 11 days of “Use or Lose” leave. He was appointed as interim Security Manager and acted on the behalf of the Commander. The Commander was not in place until Sep 13, which did not allow sufficient time to use his remaining leave. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving in the Air National Guard in the grade of Senior Master Sergeant (E-8). According to the applicant's 1 - 31 Oct 13 leave and earnings statement (LES), he lost 11 days of leave on 30 Sep 13. As a result, his leave balance was reduced from 86 days to 75 days. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1P recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, para 10.1., “the situation preventing members from using leave must have been caused by a catastrophe, national emergency, and/or crisis of operation in defense of national security.” In order for the applicant, a 30 plus year E-8, to have 11 days of use or lose leave, he had to have accumulated a balance of 75 days, which would have taken over two years (Apr 11 – Oct 13) to accrue. The applicant’s deployment in support of Operation Enduring Freedom from Jun 10 – Feb 11 falls during a separate time period. According to AFI 36-3003, para 10.8., members are ineligible from special leave accrual (SLA) when training exercises, pending separations, and retirements preclude using leave. There is no record of the applicant submitting a request for, or being prohibited from, using leave. Though the applicant’s hard work, dedication and additional hours are admirable, his application does not clearly establish that an error or injustice by the Air Force caused him to lose leave. A complete copy of the NGB/A1P evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Aug 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02084 in Executive Session on 29 Jan 14, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Apr 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, NGB/A1P, not dated . Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 14.