RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02111

  			COUNSEL:  NONE

			HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He Reenlistment Eligibility (RE) Code of 2X meaning “1st term, 2nd 
term or career airman considered but not selected for 
reenlistment,” be changed to a code allowing reentry in the 
Service.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The 2X code must be a typographical error and should be 
corrected.  The Board should find it in the interest of justice 
to consider her application because it was brought to her 
attention by a recruiter that the 2X code does not allow reentry 
and she is interested in rejoining the Air Force.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 7 Jun 01, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular 
Air Force.

On 3 Sep 04, her supervisor did not recommend her for 
reenlistment on the AF IMT 418, Selective Reenlistment Program 
Consideration, because she refused to participate in a scheduled 
deployment rendering her unable to fulfill her obligation as a 
security forces member.  She was referred to Life Skills who 
recommended she not deploy due to difficulty dealing with 
stress.

On 13 Sep 04, she acknowledged receipt indicating she did not 
intend to appeal her supervisor’s decision. 

On 6 Jun 05, the applicant received an honorable discharge, and 
was credited with 4 years of active service.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial.  On 6 Jun 05 after serving four 
years of service, she was discharged with an honorable character 
of service.  She was non-selected for reenlistment by her 
commander using an AF IMT 418, on 8 Apr 09.  She acknowledged 
non-selection and rendered her intent not to appeal the decision 
in section V on 13 Sep 09.  Based on her non-selection, she 
received an RE code of 2X, which she claims is a typographical 
error however; she was denied reenlistment by her commander 
under the SRP and chose not to appeal the decision.  
  
AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, states commanders have 
selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority.  
The Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) considers the members 
Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable 
Information File (UIF) from any substantiated source, the 
airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or 
the airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and 
duty performance levels.       

The complete DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 8 Sep 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-02111 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 19 May 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 11 Jun 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 8 Sep 14.