RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02511 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her separation date be changed to August 2006 and her grade to be corrected to airman first class (E-3). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She did not receive her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, until September 2012 and has been trying to get the errors corrected through various sources. She does not know the source of the errors but would simply like resolution. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 7 Sep 04, the applicant initially entered the Air Force Reserve. On 19 Dec 04, the applicant was honorably released from active duty, for completion of initial active duty training, in the grade of airman basic (E-1) and was credited with 3 months, and 12 days of active service. At this time, the member had not completed her first full term of service. On 1 Jan 06, the applicant was promoted to the grade of airman first class (E-3). On 6 Feb 10, the applicant’s commander recommended her for administrative discharge for unsatisfactory participation pursuant to AFI 36-3209, Separation and Retirement Procedures for Air National Guard and Air Force Reserve Members. On 28 May 10, the discharge authority approved the applicant’s separation from the Air Force Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice with regards to the applicant’s DD Form 214 for the period 7 Sep 04 through 19 Dec 04. In accordance with AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, to receive a DD Form 214 [to reflect the grade of airman first class (E-3), as of 1 Jan 06] the applicant must have completed 90 days or more consecutive active duty days or 1 day or more in support of a contingency operation. After a review of the applicant’s orders and points summary, no evidence exists to justify correcting her separation date or grade. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluations was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02511 in Executive Session on 22 Apr 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 22 Jul 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 11 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.