RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-02736 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Active Duty Service Commitment (ADSC) date be changed for Transfer of Education Benefits (TEB). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: On 14 Jan 14, he was notified by the virtual Military Personnel Flight (vMPF) that his TEB application approval required him to extend his reenlistment by nine months. He signed the Statement of Understanding (SOU) on 2 Jun 14 for which his TEB application was approved, incurring an ADSC of four years, to Jun 2018. He originally applied for TEB on 30 Mar 11 so his ADSC should be Mar 15. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is currently serving on active duty as a Master Sergeant (MSgt/E-7). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence the applicant signed the SOU in March 11. With an SOU, Total Force Service Center personnel cannot determine if the member accepts the four year ADSC; therefore, no eligibility for the program could be established, as the law/regulations cite the date of request as the date on which the appropriate service obligation would be established (AFI 36-2306, The Air Force Education Services Program, Attachment 9, A9.18.1.2, A9.18.1.3, and A9.18.1.4). Without a signed SOU, eligibility cannot be determined and the TEB application must be disapproved. The applicant signed the SOU on 2 Jun 14 for the TEB application that was submitted and approved on that date. The complete DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to change his Active Duty Service Commitment, we do not believe he has demonstrated evidence of an injustice, as compared to others in his similar situation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-02736 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jun 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 20 Oct 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Nov 14.