RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03108 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be updated to reflect the following awards along with any associated campaign streamers: Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor (AFOUA w/V); (Administratively corrected) Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P); (Administratively corrected) Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM); (Administratively corrected) Small Arms Expert Marksmanship Ribbon (SAEMR). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was not aware of his eligibility for the awards until notified by the Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA). He was on active duty at Da Nang Air Base, South Vietnam from 1985 to 1986. While at Clark Air Force Base, Philippines he qualified with an M-16 Rifle as a Small Arms Expert Marksman, but never received his ribbon. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 25 Jun 62, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. According to his AF Form 7, Airman Military Record, he was assigned to Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam from 3 Jul 65 to 20 Jul 66. On 21 Jun 66, the applicant received an honorable discharge. He was credited with 3 years, 11 months and 27 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), included at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends approval of the AFOUA w/V & 2BOLC, Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) w/two Bronze Service Stars (2BSS), RVNGC w/P, and the VCM. The applicant was assigned to the 341st Combat Defense Squadron, Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana, between 12 Sep 62 and 13 Feb 64, during which time they received award of the AFOUA for award inclusive period 22 Oct 62 to 31 Dec 63. He was also assigned to the 6252nd Air Police Squadron, Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam between 1 Oct 65 and 7 Apr 66, during which time they received award of the AFOUA for award inclusive period 1 Jun 65 to 7 Apr 66. Additionally, the applicant was assigned to the 35th Air Police Squadron, Da Nang Air Base, Vietnam between 8 Apr 66 and 20 Jun 66, during which time they received the AFOUA for award inclusive period 8 Apr 66 to 31 May 66. The applicant received the VSM, as annotated on his DD Form 214. DPSID believes the applicant is requesting campaign streamers in conjunction with award of the VSM. Based on his dates in Vietnam, DPSID was able to verify he is authorized two Bronze Service Stars (BSS) to the VSM for his participation in the Vietnam Defensive Campaign and Vietnam Air Campaign. AFPC/DPSID recommends disapproval of campaign streamers. The award of the BSS to the applicant’s awarded VSM is the appropriate individual recognition of the applicant’s campaign participation. Campaign streamers denote participation of a unit in a designated DoD campaign. Awarded for active Federal military service to units or organizations that are authorized an organizational color or distinguishing flag to recognize receipt of campaign participation credit. Campaign streamers are embroidered swallow-tailed ribbons of the same design as campaign or service medals awarded to members for service in a named campaign. Campaign streamers are usually embroidered with the name of the campaign, operation, or expedition designated by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, authorized by the DoD and announced in DoD Manual 1348.33. Eligible units carry a campaign streamer on their organizational flag start and guidon. Each designated campaign name for which the unit receives participation credit is embroidered on an individual campaign streamer. Commanders of units that meet the unit eligibility requirements procure, through supply channels, and display the appropriate campaign streamer after written evidence (message, memorandum, special order) from AFPC/DPSIDR or the Air Component Command that is responsible for the air war of the particular war, campaign or conflict. Streamer sizes vary depending on the size of the flag on the flag staff. DPSID recommends disapproval of the SAEMR. They were unable to verify the applicant qualified as expert with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun; rendering him ineligible for the award. The SAEMR is awarded to all United States Air Force members who after 1 Jan 63, qualify as “expert” in small-arms marksmanship with either the M-16 rifle or issue handgun. Qualification as “expert” in both weapons after 22 Jun 72 shall be denoted by a bronzer service star worn on the service ribbon. Based on review of the applicant’s official military personnel record, DPSID was able to determine that the below Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons should have been awarded during the applicant’s service from 25 Jun 62 to 21 Jun 66 and were not reflected in his records. Upon final board decision, administrative correction of the applicant’s official military personnel record will be completed by AFPC/DPSOR: *Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) *Air Force Outstanding Unit Award with Valor and two Bronze Oak Leaf Clusters (AFOUA w/V & 2BOLC) *Vietnam Service Medal with two Bronze Service Stars (VSM w/2BSS) *Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm (RVNGC w/P) *Vietnam Campaign Medal (VCM) The complete DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice warranting correction of the applicant’s records to reflect his entitlement to the SAEMR and campaign streamers. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission, including attachments, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting relief beyond that rendered administratively. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03108 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Jul 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 3 Nov 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 15.