RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03402 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her retirement points be recalculated due to her return to active duty status. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There is a discrepancy in the number of service years, months, and days she received credit for on her final National Guard Bureau (NGB) Form 22, Report of Separation and Record of Service, in items 10a-10e. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 5 Mar 04, the applicant entered the Air National Guard. On 28 Feb 13, the applicant was transferred to USAF Reserve Retired List and was credited with 21 years, 5 months, 13 days service for retired pay purposes. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error in the applicant’s record. After careful review of her record of service, DPTT found items 10a-10e of the NGB Form 22 are correct. The record of service on her NGB Form 22 matches the time shown on the calculator used to compute service time. Her enlistment date was verified by the DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, and her prior active service times was verified by a Points Credit Summary. All rows with an “FR” code reflect prior active service. Item 10e is the only item missing on the service calculation, but is captured on the Points Credit Summary under satisfactory service. The complete DPTT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, including copies of special duty orders, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03402 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 11 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, ARPC/DPTT, dated 11 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Dec 14.