RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03428 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Home of Record (HOR) be changed to Sacramento, CA. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: While he lived in Sacramento, CA he was recruited to the Air Force by a recruiter in Enid, OK. The recruiter mistakenly recorded his HOR as Enid, OK instead of Sacramento, CA. While visiting his sister in Enid, OK, he met with the recruiter to process documentation. However, most of the documents used in his recruitment were faxed from Sacramento, CA. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 17 Mar 09, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 10 Oct 14, the applicant was released from active duty while earning an Honorable character of service distinction. He was credited with 5 years, 6 months and 24 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, is the source document for HOR. The Joint Federal Travel Regulation, Volume I, Appendix A, reads Home of Record is the place recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty. Additionally, it states the place recorded as the individual’s home when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted or ordered into the tour of active duty unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day may the member change the HOR. Any such correction must be fully justified and the home, as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the Service, and not a different place selected for the member’s convenience. AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch confirmed that the member initialed his DD Form 4 dated 17 Mar 09, which listed Enid (Garfield), OK, US as his HOR. The complete DPSIP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Oct 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, including the copy of his birth certificate, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03428 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIP, dated 11 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 10 Oct 14.