RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03485 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) be changed from Sun City, Arizona (AZ) to Lake Arrowhead, California (CA). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He is a native resident of CA. His birth certificate reflects San Bernardino, CA, his high school was Lake Arrowhead, CA, and his wife is from Lake Arrowhead, CA. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 31 Jul 08, the applicant signed his initial DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, for enlistment in the Air Force Reserve. He entered Sun City, AZ in Block 3 of the DD Form 4, Home of Record. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The DD Form 4 is the source document for HOR and place of entry (POE). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR) states “The place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commissioned, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into the tour of duty, unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day may the member change the HOR.” Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR will not. The applicant initialed his DD Form 4 after listing Sun City, AZ as his HOR. There is no error in the record. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of AFPC/DPSIPE and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03485 in Executive Session on 14 May 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03485 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 18 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 18 Nov 14. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 15.