RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03507 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The Enlisted Retention Board (ERB) take another look at his records due a missing Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) from 2012 that was added to his records. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He believes that his EPR from 2012 was not included during the board decision process for retention. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Jan 04. On 29 Sep 14, the applicant was discharged honorably, and was credited with 10 years, 8 months, and 24 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the applicant’s personnel record reflects that his record met the ERB. The applicant was not selected for continued retention in the Air Force. Individuals not selected for retention by the ERB will have a mandatory separation date established as 31 Jan 15. PSDM 13- 129, dated 23 Dec 13 (amended 22 Jan 14), states “As such, records reviewed by the Retention Boards are considered accurate at the time of review; therefore, will be no process for airmen to appeal the board’s decision.” The 2012 EPR that the applicant is referencing was in his records for the board to consider. The inclusive dates of the EPR were 3 Nov 11 thru 13 Sep 12 with 200 days of supervision. The applicant believes that a correction that was made to his EPR prevented the board from having the opportunity to review his EPR prior to their decision. The change made only affected the inclusive dates and the days of supervision, not a change in content. The EPR that was in his records at the time the ERB convened was sufficient enough documentation for the board to make an informed decision regarding the applicant’s retention status. The overall rating and content remained the same. These changes would not have made a significant difference in their decision. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 Nov 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03507 in Executive Session on 14 May 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03507 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Aug 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 12 Sep 14. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Nov 14..