RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03598

					COUNSEL:  NONE

					HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from Albuquerque, NM to San 
Antonio, TX.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She applied for a change in state residency and HOR during her 
in-processing with her unit in San Antonio and was under the 
impression that she had completed all the necessary paperwork.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s AF Form 133, Oath of Office 
(Military Personnel), on 24 Feb 95, she was appointed to the 
grade of second lieutenant (2Lt, O-1) in the Regular Air Force 
in Albuquerque, NM. 

According to the applicant’s AF Form 766, Extended Active Duty 
Order, dated 18 Apr 95, Albuquerque, NM is reflected as her HOR.

The applicant is currently serving on active duty.   


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPANF2 recommends denial.  After a thorough review of the 
applicant's military personnel record and other supporting 
documentation, there appears to be no error or injustice 
regarding the applicant’s HOR.  Joint Federal Travel Regulation 
Volume I, Appendix A1, states in part that a HOR is the place 
recorded as the individual’s home when commissioned, appointed, 
enlisted, inducted, or ordered into a tour of active duty unless 
there is a break in service of more than one full day.  Only if 
a break in service exceeds one full day may the member change 
the HOR.  Any correction must be fully justified and the home, 
as corrected, must be the member’s actual home upon entering the 
Service, and not a different place selected for the member's 
convenience.  The applicant did not have a break in service of 
more than one full day; therefore, a change to her HOR is not 
authorized.
	
The complete DPANF2 evaluation, with attachments is at Exhibit 
B.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 23 Dec 14 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit C).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03598 in Executive Session on 13 May 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-03598 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Sep 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPANF2, dated 12 Nov 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 23 Dec 14.