RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-03986 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Home of Record (HOR) be changed from California to Ohio on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was an “out-of-state” student in college in California and was recruited immediately after graduation. At the time, the recruiter told her to put down any address of friends she had in California. The recruiter put her on a one-month delay, so on 14 Jul 99, she went to basic training. She moved back to Ohio in 2004 and applied for State of Ohio veteran’s benefits but discovered the HOR error, so she is trying to fix it in order to access those benefits. She provides copies of her academic transcript from Alliant International University in California showing her HOR as Middletown, OH and DD Form 214 showing nearest relative’s address as Middletown, OH. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 14 Jul 99, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. According to DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, dated 23 Jun 99, her HOR is listed as XXXXX XXXXXXX, XXXXXX, Fremont, CA XXXXXXXXXX. According to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, associated with her 13 Jul 03 release from active duty, her HOR at time of entry is listed as XXXXXXXXXXXX Fremont, CA 94536. On 13 Jul 03, the applicant was released from active duty with an honorable character of service after completion of her required active service and transferred to the Air Force Reserves. She was credited with 4 years of active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, is the source document for HOR and Place of Entry (POE). The Joint Federal Travel Regulation (JFTR), volume 1, Appendix A1, part 1, states, “The place recorded as the home of the individual when reinstated, reappointed, or reenlisted remains the same as that recorded when commission, appointed, enlisted or inducted, or ordered into the tour of active duty, unless there is a break in service of more than one full day. Only if a break in service exceeds one full day; may the member change the HOR.” The HOR is the location identified by the individual upon entering the service, not a location where the individual is later assigned or a location selected for convenience; a correction must be fully justified. Domicile or legal residence may change, but the HOR will not. AFPC Enlisted Accessions Branch was able to confirm that the member initialed the DD Form 4 listing XXXXX XXXXXXXXX, XXXX, Fremont, CA XXXXX as her HOR. The complete DPSIPE evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant submitted a response stating when she was in contact with her recruiter she was a full-time out-of-state student at Alliant International University in California. She was only one month away from graduating with a BA in Sociology, so the recruiter delayed her entry by one month. She submitted proof that she was not living at the address listed on her DD Form 214; that she was an out-of-state student as listed on her official transcript. Had she been living at the California address, it would have been listed on her transcript. However, she had never rented or lived at the California address listed as her HOR. As someone who was born and raised in Ohio and only went to school in California, she would like the address changed to XXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX, XXXX, Middletown, OH 45044. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include her rebuttal of the Air Force advisory, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. While we acknowledge the applicant’s request to change her home of record, we do not believe she has demonstrated evidence of an injustice, as compared to others in her similar situation. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-03986 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Sep 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPE, dated 18 Nov 14. Exhibit D. Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Jan 15.