RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04221 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be reimbursed for two days of leave. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His squadron’s support staff readjusted his days of leave while he was on leave which resulted in him owing a debt. His permissive and terminal leave were approved before his out- processing and should not have been changed. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 31 May 89. On 31 Aug 14, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with 20 years, 2 months, and 19 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIM recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. In accordance with AFI 36-3003, Military Leave Program, the losing commander may approve up to 20 days of permissive temporary duty leave for Continental United States (CONUS) based members. Permissive temporary duty must occur within 180 days of the separation or retirement date, and may be in conjunction with terminal leave. Terminal leave is chargeable leave taken in conjunction with retirement or separation from active duty. Based on the evidence provided, they were unable to determine if the support staff readjusted the dates of the applicant’s leave while he was on leave. His leave history in the Master Military Pay Account, dated 12 Nov 14, does not reflect any lost leave. Additionally, the Finance Out-processing Checklist stated, at the time, the applicant did not owe a debt as of 6 May 14. However, the checklist also stated “subsequent review or audit of records may establish that you are indebted for an amount not indicated on this list. Failure by the organizations to reflect debt on this checklist does not in any way represent a release or waiver of that debt.” A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIM evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04221 in Executive Session on 18 Jun 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04221 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Sep 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIM, dated 24 Nov 14,w/atch. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 15.