RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04479

      					COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His Retention/Retirement (R/R) date be changed from 9 Sep to 
25 Jun . 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His R/R date should not have been adjusted as a result of his 
four day break-in-service.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is currently serving in the Air Force Reserves 
(AFRES) in the grade of technical sergeant (E-6).

On 5 Sep 11, the applicant received an honorable discharge with 
a narrative reason for separation of “Completion of Required 
Active Service.”  He was credited with 9 years, 2 months and 
11 days of total active service.

On 9 Sep 11, the applicant enlisted in the Air National Guard 
(ANG).

On 28 May 14, the applicant was honorably discharged from the 
ANG, effective 14 May 14 and was transferred to the AFRES, 
effective 15 May 14.


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  The applicant’s R/R date was 
established as 9 Sep 11 as a result of a break-in-service 
incurred when the applicant was discharged from active duty and 
enlisted in the ANG four days later.  Department of Defense 
Instruction (DoDI) 1215.07, Enclosure 3, paragraph 1c(2) states, 
“when a Service member with a break-in-service returns to active 
Reserve status, the revised anniversary date will be the return 
to active Reserve status.  In the applicant’s case, his 
enlistment in the ANG established the revised anniversary date.

The complete DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 17 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the 
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04479 in Executive Session on 6 Aug 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	                         , Panel Chair
	                        , Member
	                  , Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-04479 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 27 Oct 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Letter, ARPC/DPTS, dated 3 Dec 14.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 Feb 15.