RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04507 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States, be corrected to reflect the award the Atomic Veterans Service Medal. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He participated in Operations BUSTER JANGLE and TUMBLER SNAPPER. These Operations were United States Atmospheric Nuclear Tests conducted at the Nevada Test Site during 1951 and 1952, respectively. In support of his request, the applicant provided a letter from the Defense Threat Reduction Agency, dated 9 Aug 00 which confirmed his participation in the tests and an extract from the National Association of Atomic Veterans, Inc which provides information on H.R. 4778, a proposed bill to authorize the award of a military service medal to members of the Armed Forces who were exposed to ionizing radiation as a result of the testing nuclear weapons. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 5 Feb 51. On 15 Dec 53, the applicant was furnished an Honorable discharge, and was credited with 2 years, 10 months, and 11 days of active service. The applicant’s DD Form 214 reflects the award of the following Air Force Medals and/or Ribbons: - National Defense Service Medal The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice as the Atomic Veterans Service Medal is not an official award or decoration of the United States Air Force and/or Department of Defense (DoD). The Atomic Veterans Service medal was introduced as H.R. 4778, the “Atomic Veterans Service Medal Act.” The bill would authorize the DoD to award a military service medal to members of the Armed Forces who were exposed to radiation as a result of nuclear weapon testing. The bill was never passed or signed into law. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 29 May 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04507 in Executive Session on 25 Aug 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04507 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Oct 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 16 Mar 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 29 May 15.