RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04724 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her reentry (RE) code of 2X (1st term, 2nd term or career airman considered but not selected for reenlistment under the Selective Reenlistment Program [SRP]) be changed to a “1” series RE code to allow reentry in the military. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: She was not given ample time to show improvement. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 4 August 2009. According to the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS) the applicant was denied the Air Force Good Conduct Medal (AFGCM) for the period of 4 August 2009 through 3 August 2012. On 24 September 2012, an AF Form 418, Selective Reenlistment Program (SRP) Consideration for Airmen in the Regular Air Force/Air Force Reserve, was initiated indicating the applicant was not selected for reenlistment due to her repeated failure to adapt to and abide by military standards. On 28 September 2012, the applicant indicated her intent to appeal the decision. On 29 September 2012, a DD Form 2648, Pre-separation Counseling Checklist, was initiated with the applicant’s anticipated date of separation (DOS), effective 3 August 2013. On 3 October 2012, the applicant’s reenlistment eligibility code was updated from 1R (1st term airmen selected for reenlistment) to 2X. On 24 October 2012, the applicant’s non-selection for reenlistment appeal was denied and she acknowledged receipt of the action. On 2 May 2013, the applicant requested separation for miscellaneous reason, effective 31 May 2013. On 31 May 2013, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, with a narrative reason for separation of “Non-Retention on Active Duty,” and was issued a RE code of 2X and separation program designator (SPD) code of JGH (Failure to meet minimum qualifications for retention). She was credited with 3 years, 9 months, and 27 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial. In accordance with (IAW) AFI 36-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, commanders have selective reenlistment selection or non-selection authority. The SRP considers the member’s Enlisted Performance Report (EPR) ratings, Unfavorable Information from any substantiated source, the airman’s willingness to comply with Air Force standards and/or the airman’s ability (or lack of) to meet required training and duty performance levels. In this case, it is apparent the commander had justification for denial of reenlistment based on the information in the remarks section of the applicant’s AF Form 418. Additionally, IAW with AFI 36-2606, all airmen selected under the SRP and elect separation are eligible for the “1” series RE code and thereby given a RE code of “1J”. Therefore, the applicant is ineligible for the “1” series RE code because it does not apply to her situation since she was denied reenlistment eligibility by her commander under the SRP. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 17 February 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04724 in Executive Session on 24 June 2015 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04724 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 15 November 2014. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 12 December 2014. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 17 February 2015. 1 2