RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04822 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His reentry (RE) code of 2C [Entry level separation (ELS) without characterization of service] be changed to an RE code which will allow him to reenter the military. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He was discharged for depression, but no longer suffers from depression. He now has a family to provide for and feels the military is where he should be. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 8 Oct 13. On 1 Apr 14, the applicant was furnished an ELS, with a Separation Program Designator (SPD) code of “JFY” (Adjustment Disorder,” an RE code of 2C, “uncharacterized” character of service, a narrative reason for separation of “Adjustment Disorder,” and was credited with 5 months and 24 days of total active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice concerning his SPD code, narrative reason for separation, or character of service. On 13 Mar 14, the applicant’s commander notified him he was recommending him for discharge from the Air Force for a condition which interferes with military service, specifically, for a mental disorder. The reason for taking this action was the applicant was diagnosed by a Behavioral Analysis Service psychologist as having an adjustment disorder with depressed mood. The applicant was advised of his right to legal counsel and to submit statements in his own behalf. The applicant’s commander subsequently recommended him for discharge, the discharge package was reviewed and determined to be legally sufficient, and the discharge authority directed the applicant be discharged with an ELS with “uncharacterized” character of service. The applicant was evaluated for depression, and demonstrated impairment across diverse domains of functioning including difficulty sleeping, anxiety symptoms, and low concentration and/or ability to learn. His medical report indicates his symptoms were unlikely to abate and the applicant reported a lack of motivation to continue in the Air Force. Expeditious separation was recommended. Therefore, the SPD code and narrative reason for separation are correct. In addition, uncharacterized service is correct with an ELS. There is no evidence of an error or an injustice in the discharge process or the documentation. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPSOA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice concerning the applicant’s RE code. The applicant received an ELS. The RE code of 2C is required by AFI 26-2606, Reenlistment in the USAF, based upon the ELS. The applicant does not provide any evidence of an error or an injustice. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATIONS: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 25 Feb 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendations of the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPRs) and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04822 in Executive Session on 8 Sep 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Panel Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 20 Nov 14. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 23 Dec 14. Exhibit D.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOA, dated 6 Feb 15. Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 25 Feb 15.